MARK
GEO SCORE CHECKER

A number alone doesn't tell you why AI engines skip your article. Mark does.

Send Mark a published article and it scores it against a 63-criteria rubric, from AEO structure to whether your robots.txt even lets GPTBot in, and names the exact line holding it back. Checking an article doesn't use up your plan's articles.

Start free — 14 daysSee it work

No credit card. Score your first article free during the trial.

One request, start to finish

Read→Access→Structure→Score→Fix
mark · live taskDone
Score my article about CRM software for AI citability and tell me what's failing.
Reading the published article
Checking robots.txt against GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot
Checking for a direct answer in the first 150 words
Checking sourced data and dated citations
Confirming schema markup actually survived the save
Scoring against the 63-criteria rubric
Ranking fixes by traffic at stake
Scored ✅ 71/114. 4 fixes found, ranked by traffic at stake, first one ready to apply:
Missing direct answer in first 150 words → rewrite ready

One message on WhatsApp. Mark read the article, checked structure, sources and access, scored it, and handed back what to fix first.

A number alone is not an audit

Generic checkers give you a score. Mark gives you the fix.

Most GEO or AI-visibility checkers run a page through a black-box model and hand back a number with no way to act on it. Mark's score comes from a documented, pass-or-fail rubric, and every failure points straight at what fixes it.

Generic AI checker
Mark
Checks robots.txt against named AI crawlers
Scores against a documented, pass-or-fail rubric
Confirms schema markup survived the CMS save
Names the exact line each failure lives on
Ranks fixes by real Search Console traffic
Can rewrite the fix in the same request
What actually moves the score

Citations move the needle. Keywords stuffed in do the opposite.

The most common GEO mistake is treating it like more SEO: pack in the keyword a few more times and hope an AI model notices. Princeton's own GEO research found the opposite works better, and that keyword-stuffing measurably hurts how often a page gets cited (Princeton GEO study, 2024).

Mark's rubric weighs the things the research actually found to matter: a direct, self-contained answer near the top, sourced data with a year attached, and structured FAQ markup an engine can lift as a unit, not just more repetitions of the target phrase.

A direct answer inside the first 150 words, not buried under a preamble
Sourced stats and dated citations, never a vague claim with nothing behind it
FAQ schema markup that survives the CMS save, checked live, not assumed
What the score is actually built on

63 criteria. Nothing on this list is a guess.

Pass or fail, no partial credit, so a score can't be talked up.

63

pass-or-fail criteria in Mark's quality rubric, across SEO, structure, depth, links, and AEO

80/114

score below this means real rewrite work is pending, not a detail to polish later

10%

measured visibility Mark protects by leading with sources instead of stuffed keywords (Princeton GEO study, 2024)

3

named AI crawlers checked against your robots.txt before anything else: GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot

Pricing

Pay for articles published,
not for seats.

Hire Mark like an employee: one flat monthly fee, no per-seat cost. Start with 14 days free, no card.

Starter

$59 USD/mo

For the blog you already have and never feed.

  • 12 articles researched, written and published
  • 1 connected domain
  • Keyword research on the real SERP, not on intuition
  • 25 keywords in your interlinking map
  • Covers from ready-made templates
  • Kickoff session with our SEO team (1 hour)
  • Extra articles at $5
Most popular

Growth

$129 USD/mo

Publish every working day without hiring anyone.

  • 30 articles a month, at $4.30 each
  • 3 domains
  • 100 keywords in your interlinking map
  • Custom covers in your brand
  • Kickoff with our SEO team: 1 hour of strategy + 1 hour of follow-up at 30 days
  • Multilingual content (ES, EN, PT, IT)
  • Priority support
  • Extra articles at $4

Agency

$399 USD/mo

Bill content to your clients. Mark carries your name.

  • 100 articles a month, at $3.99 each
  • Multi-user: invite your whole team at no per-seat cost and split the articles between them
  • Unlimited domains
  • Client management portal
  • 500 keywords in your interlinking map
  • White label, Agency only: your clients see your agency, not Mark
  • Kickoff with our SEO team: 2 strategy sessions
  • Direct channel into our SEO community
  • Dedicated support
  • Extra articles at $3.50

A freelance SEO article runs $100 to $300 USD. With Mark, from $3.99, already researched, optimized and published to your CMS.

Add-ons: Extra domain $15/mo · Extra hour of SEO consulting $80

Every plan includes a 14-day free trial, no credit card. Change plan or cancel whenever you want. Pay yearly and get 2 months free. Unused articles don't roll over. The Agency SEO community channel stays open for your whole subscription, answered in under 4 business hours.

Ready to hire Mark?

Set it up in 10 minutes. No developers. Your first article today.

Questions

Before you start

It's how well an article is structured to be read and cited by generative engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google's AI Overviews, not just ranked by Google. Mark's version is a pass-or-fail score out of 114 points across 63 documented criteria, not a single opaque number.

Most GEO checkers run your page through a model and return a score with no way to act on it. Mark's score comes from a documented rubric, names the exact line each failure lives on, and can rewrite the fix in the same request.

No. Auditing an already-published article doesn't count against your monthly article quota, whether it comes back with a passing score or a list of fixes.

Yes, first. Mark parses your robots.txt against GPTBot, PerplexityBot, and ClaudeBot before scoring anything else, because a blocked crawler makes the rest of the audit irrelevant.

Both, if you want. Every finding points to what fixes it, whether that's rewriting a section, inserting schema markup, or adding inbound links, and Mark can make the fix in the same conversation.